Thursday, January 12, 2006

Chief Marketing Officer mag suspends publication

January 12, 2006.
A Message to Our Readers

As we have chronicled in our print magazine and on our website, one of the CMO’s greatest challenges is balancing a plan for long-term growth with the pressures to produce short-term results. An inability to strike the proper balance is a key contributor to the CMO’s startling 24-month average tenure.

At CMO magazine, we share your struggles – and your short shelf life. Current business realities require us to suspend publication of our 16-month-old magazine as of the January 2006 issue. The extraordinary feedback and support from the CMO community has not been enough to sustain and grow our advertising-supported business in what has become a severely challenged publishing environment.

As a result, we have decided to hit the pause button, take a step back, and consider alternative business plans. It is my sincere hope that we will be able to return with an exciting strategy to invigorate the business and once again begin serving what has quickly become a faithful community of senior marketing executives and other marketing practitioners.

In the meantime, I would like to thank you, our loyal readers, for your patronage, your thoughtful feedback, and your commitment to helping us build this new brand. I would like to thank our advertisers and sponsors for their staunch support. I would like to thank our publisher, Steve Twombly, along with the rest of the sales, marketing, operations and events staff at CXO Media for their tireless efforts in launching CMO in 2004 and driving it forward over the past year and a half.

Most of all, I would like to thank CMO’s talented team of writers, editors and designers for producing a consistently high-quality magazine that surpassed everyone’s expectations. The flame burns brightest, the saying goes, just before it flickers out. CMO has never burned more brightly.

Rob O’Regan, Editor in Chief

6 Comments:

At 1/12/2006 9:36 AM, Blogger Mike said...

My calendar says January 12th, but after reading this I can't help think it's April 1st. I'm not sure where to begin...

In a related note, that venerable publication Technology Review has announced that it is cutting back its paper publications dramatically and focusing on web content. Apparently the MIT board wasn't thrilled with their results either.

I blame it on those evil weblog thingees.

nahabjf - Last words of a stampeded hajj rock thrower

 
At 1/12/2006 10:14 AM, Blogger fouro said...

There. I maanged to knock out Jamuary's business-oriented posts in one day.

Bummer, that;'s a cool mag. There's a whole buncha change coming to publishing I imagine..

xxgwgpy - i got nothin

 
At 1/13/2006 9:12 AM, Blogger Mike said...

It'll be interesting to see how things play out for both publications. If TR and a publication for marketing executives can't be successful in the internet age, there's something VERY wrong. I'll be interested in how the new TR format works out; if successful, it could be a model for other publications.

 
At 1/15/2006 12:53 PM, Blogger fouro said...

"internet age" sez it all, dude. We're in the middle of a slow motion train wreck and most don't know it--frogs in slowly warmimg water and all that...

klraf - Bader

 
At 1/16/2006 10:12 AM, Blogger Mike said...

Your Bader link doesn't work. Are you saying that the light at the end of the tunnel is an oncoming train for everyone, or just a lot of established media types?

ubytbu - in the Dali-clock-style lettering of word verification, it almost looks like a palindrome

 
At 1/18/2006 9:37 PM, Blogger fouro said...

Doh....

Bader

qdsuwrx - Quid Sue Wrecks: the only avenue left to all those Abramoff clients now that Abramoff, their money and their names are radioactive

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home