Monday, September 04, 2006

Finally, the President gets ahead of the curve.
July 30, 1996

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, doubted that the Senate would rush to action before they recess this weekend. The Senate needs to study all the options, he said, and trying to get it done in the next three days would be tough.

One key GOP senator was more critical, calling a proposed study of chemical markers in explosives "a phony issue."

Clinton said he knew there was Republican opposition to his proposal on explosive taggants, but it should not be allowed to block the provisions on which both parties agree.

"What I urge them to do is to be explicit about their disagreement, but don't let it overcome the areas of agreement," he said.

The president emphasized coming to terms on specific areas of disagreement would help move the legislation along. The president stressed it's important to get the legislation out before the weekend's recess, especially following the bombing of Centennial Olympic Park and the crash of TWA Flight 800.

"The most important thing right now is that they get the best, strongest bill they can out -- that they give us as much help as they can," he said.

Hatch blasts 'phony' issues

Republican leaders earlier met with White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta for about an hour in response to the president's call for "the very best ideas" for fighting terrorism.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the White House wants. Some they're not going to get."

Hatch called Clinton's proposed study of taggants -- chemical markers in explosives that could help track terrorists -- "a phony issue."

"If they want to, they can study the thing" already, Hatch asserted. He also said he had some problems with the president's proposals to expand wiretapping.

Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-South Dakota, said it is a mistake if Congress leaves town without addressing anti-terrorism legislation. Daschle is expected to hold a special meeting on the matter Wednesday with Congressional leaders.
What an embarassingly pre-9/11 mindset. The President should hang his head in shame. What was he thinking back in April '96 when the usual Democratic Pollyanna-Fluffball proposal was proffered?
CNN/AP: 4-16-96 ...The bill, which would cost $1 billion over four years, also calls for "tagging" plastic explosives to better trace them. The bill calls for a study on tagging methods for other explosives such as fertilizer and black powder. Critics say the study provision is a concession to groups opposed to restrictions on explosive materials.

The Republicans also dropped the additional wire-tap authority the Clinton administration wanted. U.S. Attorney general Janet Reno had asked for "multi-point" tapping of suspected terrorists, who may be using advanced technology to outpace authorities.


Rep. Charles Schumer, D-New York, said technology is giving criminals an advantage.

"What the terrorists do is they take one cellular phone, use the number for a few days, throw it out and use a different phone with a different number," he said. "All we are saying is tap the person, not the phone number."

Still, Schumer said the bill is "better than nothing" and should get some Democratic votes.
"Better than nothing?" Surrender monkey. Schumer, Daschle, Clinton. Wussies who cut and ran from the enemy. They didn't have what it takes to protect America. But Orrin Hatch does. And Don Nickles too, God bless him...
WASHINGTON (CNN) - April 18, 1996: ...The measure, which the Senate passed overwhelmingly Wednesday evening, is a watered-down version of the White House's proposal. The Clinton administration has been critical of the bill, calling it too weak.

The original House bill, passed last month, had deleted many of the Senate's anti-terrorism provisions because of lawmakers' concerns about increasing federal law enforcement powers. Some of those provisions were restored in the compromise bill.

The bill imposes limits on federal appeals by death row inmates and other prisoners and makes the death penalty available in some international terrorism cases and in cases where a federal employee is killed on duty...

But Sen. Don Nickles, R-Oklahoma, while praising the bill, said the country remains "very open" to terrorism. "Will it stop any acts of terrorism, domestic and international? No," he said, adding, "We don't want a police state."

....and the home, of the, braaaave.

h/t AmericaBlog for the linkage

3 Comments:

At 9/05/2006 5:03 PM, Blogger Dan tdaxp said...

I generally discount the wisdom of the Congress, but it is interesting how the Republican theme appears to be to protect the rights and lives of Americans, while the Democratic theme apperas to be to protect the rights and lives of foreigners.

 
At 9/05/2006 6:43 PM, Blogger fouro said...

Dan, I don't know what to say.

When a Democrat suggests that AN and more brisant stuff should have taggants and a Republican like Hatch calls that phoney, I'm lost in a world of unseriousness. When co's like Terra, in Sioux City fights it in 96, while the horse was still relatively in-the-barn, suddenly in '04 do the expedient thing in the name of "Patriotism," and at the prodding of their (R) compadres, I'm still lost in that world of unseriousness.

I'm gonna bore you and me both here, but here's but one example.

A bankruptcy Bill.

Essentially written by Citi, Fleet and Cap One.

Backed predominantly by (R)s and by Biden(MBNA).

One that, and I'm quoting my fav risk management client here, gives forebearance to credit institutions who've shaved the wisdom and meaning of creditworthyness to nanometers to harvest the gullible and hopeful. It excuses and softens the coming bad corporate bets and stupid managerial strategy.

Why'd they bet? Because financial services wondered why telcos were having all the sexy wild-west fun.

Who suffers? Well, amongst other *American* unluckies, according to DoD, who suffers is all those NG troopers on perpetual rotations who left behind better paying jobs and wives buried under bills.

Who exised the Democrat-sponsored forebearance in the bill for overseas duty? Fill in the blank.

I use the NG example Dan because I think perhaps you may have a little daylight in that direction.

I admire your ideas and your depth of knowledge Dan, but as my father taught my brother and me: orientation does poorly with a squelch knob.

 
At 9/05/2006 6:59 PM, Blogger fouro said...

ick - and typing works better with proofing. "observation does poorly with a squelch knob."

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home