Milennials: the (economically) bi-polar Generation
Huffpost blogger Adam Blickstein ponders the twin yo-yos of Irrational Exuberance and, now, belatedly, Rational Anxiety.
We are the first generation where mass media certitudes have ingrained within us certain irrevocable, perhaps unrealistic, assurances about our financial well-being. Invest young in order to profit when old, minor stock fluctuations pale in importance to the inevitable long term bonanzas, prosperity wasn't to be earned as much as it was an inherited societal right. But over the past 8 months, all that has been cast asunder. And while our parents are ostensibly the main victims of the current financial crisis, one has to wonder about what the long-term psychological consequences are for their kids of the financial rise and fall from the past 15 years.As if; for sure.
You can't tell me that Jim Cramer barking financial assurances of wealth each day on cable followed by sober laments of a complete confidence failure in our financial system won't screw with our minds...
Okay, I kid. It is an important vector of generational zeitgeist to wonder about. Unlike their Gen X siblings, Milennials launched into their formative years somewhat unconflicted, perhaps even comforted, by the virtuality of digital life--the "perfectibility" and control via ubiquitous technology that pleasure-and-stimulation-on-demand offers. X-ers, on the other hand, still had one foot in the pre-web, analog world of sensation. The storied fatalism of Gen X was "earned" as much by practical experience of the world--viewing the rough-edged beginnings of Boomer and Mature Gen failures (Watergate, Gas lines, racial busing, etc)--as by some fashionable teen-angsty pose.
Given what might be called the Nintendo fault line, maybe "undo," "cut-and paste" and the like tend to weaken the blows that are the tangible markers of progressing into a certain kind of mental sturdiness or hardiness. Maybe suffering through tough times, refracted and amplified by digital media glut will, as Blickstein wonders, make the current times even harder-seeming to Milennials than those suffered by their grandparents in the 30s.
Maybe. But I doubt it will paralyze most of them, simply because their "elders" have no freeking clue either. After all, don't conflicted views (or conflict) come from two strong wills or cosmologies meeting? In this case, one of the cosmologies is wheezing and sputtering in the way of a very aging prize fighter. Blickstein sees cognitive dissonance between the official line of "the fundamentals of the economy are sound" and the rantings of meltdown! from Jim Cramer. Well, all those grownup "smart guys" formed by the zeitgeist of the 1920s had no clue either as the verities of their world spun apart. [And, their offspring turned into, ahem, "The Greatest Generation."] I think it's a tad overdone to suggest that just because we didn't have YouTube, blogs or Twitter in 1933 that there wasn't a profound and widely shared sense of the "world turned upside down."
But I do know that Boomer parents have done their offspring no favors in the hardiness category. As we point out to our clients, that "trophy for showing up" that many 40-, 50- and 60 year-olds often lament (loudly, and with sarcastic glee) wasn't thunk up and paid for by a mediocre soccer-playing 9-year old. And yeah, those 9-year olds turned into today's staff, Mr. CEO.
In this vein of digital plenty and analog naivete, "No child left outside" is a term most appropriate to Milennials and, possibly, to their successors, what I call "Renewals" (2001-2020). These two generations span 40 years (1980 - 2020). They'll be providing a lot of the manpower and brain-power necessary to make or break an American 21st Century. And, as predicted, they inherit a social framework that is both broke and busted. (Highlighted in the graphic below, click for larger).
Huffpost's Blickstein seems worried. I think they have what it takes, and more. But guess what? In order for them to rewrite and re-form the rules, a certain prior generational mindset is going to have to step off and admit something that parents or elders are often hard-pressed to do: "We tried. We had high hopes... But that didn't end too well, did it?"

6 Comments:
I remember giving a high school speech on the "Grey Future" and how to reform social security so that it did not bankrupt the entire U.S. economy. My teachers did not like that and gave me a 'B'.
I guess you could say I have become used to being punished and ignored for delivering unpopular news. I am sure many Gen Xers can relate, but those are the cards we have been dealt and despite the sometimes open hostility of Baby Boomers we need to overcome and fix the system as best as we can. We need to think long term.
"Grey future" sounds like a pretty decent and versatile framing for a high schooler...
I'm with you on the hostility and need to overcome. I'm on the cusp of Boom and X. I wish it were not so but cosmology or paradigm shifts, it was once explained to me, don't happen because the vested see the error of their ways or find new wisdom; the vested just run out of ideas, energy or procedural steroids with which to maintain their control of the narrative.
For what it's worth, I've also given a talk, a year or so back, on how we move from Grey to Green, out of necessity *and* shifting demographic values. ("grey" in that case was both the values-free zone of late 20th C. capital formation and its eventual cannibalistic result, today's grey skies, and now that you mention it, plenty of premature grey hair too.)
Too bad you can't shortsell a culture, Scott. We'd be Warrne Buffett's by now.
You should read a Harvard Business School study on generations called the Next 20 Years by Neil Howe and William Strauss. The authors concluded that generations move in repeating cycles of prophet, nomad, hero,and artist. The hero archetype was last found in the WW II generation that formed the 'greatest generation', and the new hero generation is the Millennial one. Perhaps, unlike their predecessors where war enabled them to establish America as the global leader, economic strife will be the rallying call upon which Gen Ys rebuild America.
Great comment, thanks, Brett. As I wrote in post, analog sensibility is the one aspect that needs an upgrade for the Ys and Renewals to make their ambition (or is it calling?) a reality. We still see with recent undergrads and secondary school agers a need for "permission" or some prompt to get on with accepting the idea that "it's up to you." It's a tough corporate challenge because leaders re conflicted - "My gens' ideas are crumbling, but letting go would be... 'chaos.'" Irony abounds.
Thanks for the heads up. I'll try and track it down but my HBR subscription is no more. Any linkage?
We Millenials aren't asking for your "permission." We can do it ourselves. We aren't retarded. We are team-oriented. We are asking for consensus and input. If businesses have such a problem with this, they should tell schools and colleges to stop educating young people to work together-or maybe, just maybe older people should learn to work together better.
William Strauss has published several books on generations. His writings are widely available if you google his name.
Julia, I get the sense that you read my response to Brett and not much else of the post. I make it plain and in different words elsewhere and in the graphic: "Huffpost's Blickstein seems worried. I think they [millenials] have what it takes, and more." *It* being resourcefulness, fresh eyes, less cultural myopia and a huge freaking opening thanks to major failures of your predecessors.
I didn't say Millenials are *asking* for permission, but rather that they can seem to be hanging back waiting for .... something. I'm the parent of 2 kids born in the 90s and coach, creative director or advisor to groups of them. To my experience, there's a reticence (not wholesale, but a noticeable pattern) to boldly get on with things at this moment. You reference Team-orientation and Consensus. Well, those are great attributes but you kinda make my point. Whatever one's age cohort, they're also sometimes convenient buffers and camouflage, definitely in corporate realms and in academic ones too. Read some of today's headlines. So many refrains of "We all didn't see it coming" or "The people with the understanding didnt speak up." Not true often, what was missing was a willingness to speak up, even when it risked discomfort or ostracism.
No doubt you can and will do for yourselves; you'll have to because others are too vested in the failures to fess up and fix what they let get so broke. Please try and reread above with a patient eye. "Retarded" is hardly what it's about. Grabbing your moment and risking as well as collaborating is the message. And yes, thanks, *I* may appear slow, but the work of Strauss and Howe is familiar without need for Google.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home