Thursday, June 30, 2005

Billy, we hardly knew ya


Courtesy of the always-ahead-of-the-curve Michele Miller of WonderBranding fame comes this shocking email/newsflash: This guy was not...



As a purely public service, we direct you to rotten.com 's hoaxfile for your sordid detail fix. A snip--
Imagine the coroner's surprise in 1989 when the cadaver he was doing a routine job with, jazz musician and entertainment agent Billy Tipton, turned out to be... a woman. So came down the curtain on a brilliant deception spanning over fifty years, when an aspiring young lady named Dorothy Tipton decided to remake herself over as a man, and lived that way for the rest of her life....
Now! Now I know why the sultry in back has a bemused look on her face. She can see the outline of Billy's Platex Living Girdle.

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Michael Cade has never
Michael Cade has gotten inebriated at the Madison Museum of Bathroom Tissue but
he has never eaten at Bennett's Smut' n 'Eggs.

Michael Cade believes that abandoned office buildings are liberated and sentient places.

Michael Cade has never heard the albums Charlie the Hamster Sings the Ten Commandments or Schnappsie the Hallucinating Daschund in their entirety.
But Michael Cade has most definitely compiled a kick-ass collection of Sexy Album Covers orbiting somewhere between kitsch, softcore and an LSD-laced Up With People Camporee circa 1972.




Why, hello, Fi. Is that a metronome in your pants or are you just happy to see us?


Why is it guys who look like Howdy Doody and sing like kittens in a blender still get all the chicks? Bet Geddy Lee knows.

Lots of mileage in forward thinking

Newsweek

Despite the megawatt buzz about the Toyota Prius, Honda actually tops the charts for fuel economy among auto-makers in America. Of the 10 best gas misers on the road today, Honda has seven of them, according to the EPA. Honda also offers more hybrid models—three—than anyone else (though Toyota will soon catch up). Honda has always made leading in fuel economy a bedrock principal, even when American car buyers could not care less. But with gas and oil prices remaining stubbornly high, drivers are caring more, and their interest in mileage extends beyond what's parked in their driveway. Improving fuel economy is seen by many as a necessary step in reducing America's dependence on foreign oil and advancing a "green'' agenda for the environment.

Now that Honda's mileage mantra is looking smart, NEWSWEEK's Keith Naughton sat down with
[Honda USA's Chief Engineer, Charlie] Baker to discuss what drives the automaker to go for the green:

Naughton: Honda worried about gas mileage when gas mileage wasn't cool. Why?

Baker: Everyone at Honda views being in a company as being far more than just turning a profit. It's not that we're poor businessmen, but I think everybody at Honda is fired by the dream of creating great products that are the most efficient in their class.

Naughton: How difficult was it to keep that principle in the '90s when the SUV boom was in full swing and gas prices were at record lows?

Baker: Well, it certainly caused us pain. For a long time our president was strongly against getting into the truck market because he could not see how it was consistent with Honda values. But after a long time of wrestling with it, we said, "There are other people who are developing these trucks with horrendous fuel economy and we can do better."

Naughton: How did your rivals react when the MDX debuted in 2000?

Baker: We were criticized for being late to the party. People repeatedly told us we were going to fail.

Naughton: How difficult was it to engineer the MDX to meet Honda's stringent mileage standards?

Baker: I'll never forget it. I was a rookie leading this MDX team. We'd done the research and we had an efficient package. But when we pitched our business plan to the board of directors, Mr. [Koichi] Amemiya, who was in charge of North America, his No. 1 comment was: "It should be more green." I made the mistake of saying, "But sir, nobody cares about the green issues." And he just smiled and said "I know."

Naughton: But I'm sure your research showed that gas mileage was a very low priority to car buyers.

Baker: It certainly was, but I am absolutely ashamed of ever making that remark. Feel free not to include it in the interview.

Naughton: Does your research now show that people care about gas mileage?

Baker: If you are talking about large SUVs, yes, they are giving some lip service to fuel economy. But that is sort of a "here today, gone tomorrow"-type phenomenon. The point is not that customers demand it or don't demand it, because that's absolutely not the viewpoint of Honda. When you are a philosophy-driven company, you don't ask the customer if they agree with your philosophy.
Gracious me! Don't ask the customer? Blasphemy. Heresy!

Words. Words. Words. What the hell can I do with philosophy? Dunno, let's look it up...

Wiki
The term philosophy derives from a combination of the Greek words philos meaning love and sophia meaning wisdom.
Would this be a bad time to point readers to a post on the great Economist/Philosopher Smackdown - Why is “value” important and what is it? Yeah, maybe not.


And this surprises us, how?

NYT
Iraq May Be Prime Place for Training of Militants, C.I.A. Report Concludes

A new classified assessment by the Central Intelligence Agency says Iraq may prove to be an even more effective training ground for Islamic extremists than Afghanistan was in Al Qaeda's early days, because it is serving as a real-world laboratory for urban combat.

The assessment, completed last month and circulated among government agencies, was described in recent days by several Congressional and intelligence officials. The officials said it made clear that the war was likely to produce a dangerous legacy by dispersing to other countries Iraqi and foreign combatants more adept and better organized than they were before the conflict.
Notice this isn't "Iraq, perennial terrorist haven, gets even more friendly to Jihadis." Never was a haven, even when Abu Nidal was allowed in to see an Iraqi doctor to fix a bum leg.

Can't argue with the facts on this one. When the cat's away, the mice will play. The reason we, the US, sold Saddam all that bio and chemical ordnance up to 1991 was that he was our Cat in the region. We knew he used an iron fist to keep generic islamist terrorists out of Iraq, and he was handy as a check against post-Shah, Komeini-crazies in Iran.

And now he's gone. Replaced by grass-roots angry young cubs. Whom we completely unprofessionally allowed to snatch 38o tons of RDX/HMX high explosive that's blowing up our troops on roadsides daily. And now it's a terrorist wild-west that makes Deadwood seem like Disneyland.

Congrats, Bush voters. In one swell foop they've broken or abided the breaking of business and war rule Rumber One: Don't enable the competition/opposition. And, for heavens sake, don't make them stronger or motivate them more deeply. If polls and early response to last night's Fort Bragg pantomime are indication, those self-same voters are also struggling with a serious case of November buyer's remorse. They bought a cardboard commando mouthing GI JOE simplisms. You get what you pay for. Or think through.

And yeah, that goes for business, statecraft and warcraft.

Saturday, June 11, 2005

the virtues of inflammation

Kos
Rock>Knife>Gun>Morgue, Mssrs Dean and Krugman, RKGM.

Dean IS doing the right thing. Krugman, likewise. They're fighting. Now where's the rest of the bench?

The key to republican success in message-trafficking is message overload. They have so many pitches--sliders, curves, fast- and spitballs--and they keep em coming with the ferocity of a pitching machine. Brush em back, repeat.

Unlike the bunting Leiberman or the inconsistent Biden or the windmilling Kerry, Dean & Krugman aren't attempting to bat, because they understand the game. They're throwing ROCKS back at them. They're changing the game and you can tell somebody's doing that well when the opposition starts squalling or giving you "advice." Media included, for all intents.

Anyone familiar with OODA loops and military strategy can see the play. Unbalance your opponent; keep them rocked back on their heels, shift their frequency and plan--get INSIDE their loop, and cut it. Yes, shock them, awe them, make veins pop out of their heads. Tilt the machine. Cheney knows this, Rove knows this, hell, Ali knew this. Biden & Co? One finger wet, and up in the air, the other paw elbow deep in the shrimp cocktail.

Rock>Knife>Gun>Morgue, Messrs Krugman and Dean, RKGM. Brush em back, repeat.

fouro on Fri Jun 10th, 2005 at 05:30:10 EST [ Reply to This ]

I agree, to a point

I agree that Democrats need to fight -- I've been consistent about my dislike for the recent "deal" and the need to fight the republican agenda. But Dean is, and has, acted very naively. His heart may be in the right place, but his position calls for a professional appraoch.

I'm not advocating dumping Dean overboard. But if I were Reid and the rest of the Democratic leadership, I would whisper in his ear that the party needs someone in his position that will convince the American public that Democrats are ready to lead again.

Krugman is right about Republicans combatting facts with name calling. But I'm afraid Dean is getting close to doing the same thing. He needs to step back and understand that improvisation is great when playing jazz, terrible when giving political speeches.

by numediaman on Fri Jun 10th, 2005 at 08:55:18 EST

"a professional approach"?

In other words, play to type? Don't take this too personally? Remain at some remove? Yeah, that'll work.

A DNC chair's job in this shock and awe age is to be on point, drawing fire, generating heat that inflames, illuminates and smokes out opponnents. The vanguard behind him should then engage the targets that reveal, with vigor. And keep engaging. You know what? That kind of product demo will raise more bucks and more hearts in one year than McCauliffe's tone deafness and fey-warrior somnolence could spark in 4. Right now, Dean and Krugman are an Army of Two. Everyobdy else has the skills--okay, some everybody elses--but they're creeped out by knives and loud noises: They're waiting for "permission," and precedent... again.

That = paralysis at precisely the worst moments. No, reach and frequency, simple and sharp -- Republican favorites -- forgives a lot of mistakes and gives your competition no rest. It gives you do-overs. It also fortifies your guys because they can see their flag and hear the bugle over all the other noise too. Reach and frequency, simple and sharp. That much of old advertising media theory still has valence, if only in today's multi-channel media ring.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting wild-eyed frothing at the mouth. Chessplayers are needed, too. Reality-based humans do too have a place, otherwise the lightbill wouldn't get paid. I'm saying be a provocateur; discomfort the comortable. And keep it coming.

You know, it's weird how those pesky "chicken" french have all the great words to describe what gets under the skin and makes impact...

Provocateur
Entrepreneur
Bricoleur

Guerilla

All the above words describe a disdain for the status quo and an unwillingness to stand on formality or job description. Pardon me, numediaman, but as a marketer I feel I can say with no small amount of pattern recognition that Democrats dispay the worst of board room-level analysis paralysis, but with none of the leather chair instinct for the jugular.

Our only problem, as noted above is our bench is AWOL - providing no suppressing fire to further disorient and misdirect the opponent. Dean is doing just fine reinventing his job to be a more effective one. The current fingerbiting by our side and advice-tendering and spluttering by the Rove/Mehlman axis is a replay: They knew 36 months ago there was power and visceral appeal, not to mention truth, to his message and passion. So, their knives came out, and early, to pre-condition the marketplace. (Rememeber the infamous "we want Dean" from Rove? Like hell they did.)

Dean has point, and knows the role. His only challenge is his professional Democratic brothers and sisters are acting like Lt. Bush, circa 1970, and claiming they've seen the whites of Republican eyes.


Craft Werk Drei

Seems today is Craft Day. Several familiar notions seemed to be repeating in the previous posts, so here's a snip from a talk to Virginia Tech students and the Roanoke Ad Club given back in 2001.
BIG SCARY DINOSAURS, BIG SCARY COMPANIES versus you.

"It's not personal, it's business" is the bumper sticker of modern commerce. And well, it's false. Microsoft goes after Sun Microsystems hammer and tong because it’s personal. Republicans go after Democrats, and vice versa, because it's personal. Work longer hours and nobody says thanks, and you take it personally. Screw up a customer's experience and personally is the only way they take it if someone doesn’t jump fast.

The lie takes us further and further away from the forgotten true reason for commerce and distances us from the humanity and personal talents of those we need most. Employees and consumers. The true reason for Commerce? It’s not profit. That’s a by-product. The true reason is to satisfy physical human needs and to emotionally connect with other people.

“Business”, that nasty word, has replaced “trade.” Trade has been around since cavemen swapped shiny rocks for pointy sticks -- and it’s value and meaning went far beyond goods shared. But Business as a business has been around properly only since the renaissance or Gutenberg.

And ever since, people have been gradually discovering life just isn’t as satisfying anymore. Why, lots of reasons we think . And we’ll cover some here and offer some alternatives for change.

Reason 1: markets aren’t markets anymore.

People went to market to get stuff they needed and sell the stuff they made. Pretty obvious. But wait. A lot of the time people came and went without buying anything. So why go?

Because markets aren’t just about trade. They’re about meeting people, seeing stuff, learning new things, talking trash about neighbors, killing time, trying to find a date, or a friend.

As Christopher Locke wrote in “The Cluetrain Manifesto”, Markets are conversations.

People need markets. Because people need the satisfaction of crafting things and sensing the pleasure craft brings—pleasure for those who make, and the pleasure of those who receive. Remember our process from earlier: ESSENCE, SHIFT, CRAFT.

Craft is personal. The sweat of your own labor. The ability to haggle with someone over the value of your thing, or to answer their questions on how it works, and why you made it the way you did…. And that imparts soul and meaning into the calculus of the transaction. Soul and meaning equal satisfaction.

The personal nature of the process also automatically imparts a certain accountability that’s lost today: modern guarantees of customer satisfaction are meaningless in terms of “real satisfaction”.

Because you can’t talk to the guy or girl who made it anymore. Paradoxically, in this age of instant communication, you’re put on hold, tortured with bad elevator music and, 45 minutes later, you’re told essentially, I can’t help you it’s out of my realm of authority.

Businesses have changed, not markets. People are no fundamentally different today than they were thousands years ago. The only evolution is that the industries who can most profit from those marketplaces have invented modernist jargon and mumbo jumbo for justifying new and improved ways to deliver and develop more stuff. As I said earlier, it’s also a good way to keep fresh new ideas out as well.

With the jargon, structure and dress code comes distance and formality and gatekeepers to truth. It’s a monolgue, not a dialogue. And with all that comes disunity and suspicion. And yeah, it also brings a hellish struggle to market credibly, or to rally the troops, or to improve balance sheets.

THE MORAL? Bring back authenticity and humanity to the brands you’ll work with. Make them real and human.

Trade is the heartbeat of community. That’s not really meant to be a metaphor. Heartbeat implies a heart and hearts are usually attached to People. And, to coin a phrase, brands are people too. They are. A loaf of bread can’t insult you, yet if someone gets home and finds the loaf they just bought is moldy, they’re mad, they’re insulted. The supermarket is a bad guy. The baker is incompetent.

Companies get the blame in people terms because that’s how we relate to our world. Weird, huh? But yet the artificial personalities that businesses create to represent themselves, their brands, are often as obviously counterfeit to real people, consumers, as plastic is to wood. They sound too good to be true. They act as if they’re infallible. They’re polished, perfect, and predictable. Things real people know other real people can’t be.

People have genetic radar to spot fakers, but even those who slip under the radar, the ones who manage to con them for a while, always get a face full of mud, because an entire corporation of actors is too hard to sustain. Honesty, reality, humanity is the only script that doesn’t need rehearsals. True representative brand doesn’t need a take #2.

Town square, local pub and shopping center are meeting places. They facilitate life. And business is a subset of life, not the other way round. It seems life’s winners are people of character and talent and humanity.

Organizations, as well as people, can embody those traits if they care, and if they try. And companies and brands and leaders who recognize this are the ones people want to get to know. And the ones that get to stick around.

REASON 2: Resentment - from it stems all spiritual disease.

A bad experience—poor service, maybe—is an insult to the humanity of the customer, a metaphorical 'screw you' to their right to be pleased and respected. And poorly handled, 'screw you' is the way they hear it.

And they’re hearing “Screw you” a lot.

Maybe what’s happened is that the opportunities for insult have expanded with modern advances and commercial opportunities. We have contact with more people in a day than some of our great grandparents may have dealt with in a year. That has to have an impact.

500 channels, 4 gas stations at every intersection, thousands of other drivers on the road with us, chain of command at the office, messages missed, or unreturned or unattended to from a hundred different time saving technologies. All add up to billions of opportunities to be psychically bruised or to bruise others. And remember, it’s personal and it business. Especially in brand.

But maybe in this depressing litany lies salvation and opportunity because a thousand cuts can be fixed or at least soothed by one moment of compassion, often more effectively and noticeably from a person or entity previously known for having insulted us.

In a sick way, lowered expectations are your friend. Other companies batter consumers daily, so have your brand come to their rescue. Find the heroism in a brand. Find its inner Florence Nightingale.

And if you can’t find it, create it within the company. Because to be aware and to do or correct automatically, instinctively and without reactive resentment at being guided to do so is supremely valuable.

Why? You know that thing that makes the hair on your neck tingle after receiving an unexpected kind gesture—that’s compassion talking. And it’s a bond begging for notice. This compassion, this confidence in the face of fallibility is part of what is called 'character."

And compassion is the antidote to resentment, and it’s the lost meaning of the word “Service”. Compassion, an essential part of 'brand' character, is not perfection, It’s the recognition that a wrong unrighted or an opportunity missed alters the balance, and imbalance leads to decline. In discipline. In appeal and in market share.

Meta of brand

Excuse the metaphysics, but brand is far more spiritual than scientific. That may make some people squirm—the measurers, maybe—but think about it. Hell, to paraphrase James Burke, of Connections fame, even science is more spiritual than scientific. The guy who discovered the hydrocarbon molecule chain—he say’s it came to him in a dream. Einstein called his theories reveled “divine” truth.

The reason focus groups yield fumbling explanations and mangled syntax is that people honestly don't know why they prefer "X" over "Y". They just do. "What is 'love'?" Can't tell you, but I like it.

Guardians of brand need to know that character within brand is what appeals far more than utitlity. It’s the central theme of the fight between Mercedes and Lexus.

While we’re on the metaphysics of brand.... We're all put here to do good. Ask any minister or motivational speaker. Anything else beside the pursuit of good is a waste and will feel in your heart like a waste. Set aside moral code, and you know this just from practical work experience.

Think of the last time you were engaged on a business or academic task that you knew to be misguided, fruitless or just dumb. Were you a ray of sunshine? Showering joy on all around you? Doubtful. Wrong is infectious that way. It metastasizes and infects individuals, brands and organizations.

But the broad pursuit of consensual good generates positive energy. From good works derive good feelings and unexpected gifts. What works for people works for organizations, perhaps doubly so. Not as a means to replace higher ideals but as a conduit to them and as a pool of resources and like minds upon which to lean and learn from.

What’s consensual good in organizational terms? You and your community need to decide, but it needs the perpetual motion of realistic shared aspiration. Maybe it’s to think and solve without being prodded. To protect and serve, without being asked. To wonder and invent, while still paying the light bill.

When does that happen? We only act instinctively in positive ways when our internal code and sense of self says it’s the only option. When we are acting to preserve our own sense of how things ought to be -- what is fair, what is worth doing – then we do amazing things.

We sacrifice and offer our energy to others. We forego petty distractions because we have more important fish to fry. We become parents to our brands. We become those stonemasons who think they are building cathedrals --- not just people who cut up rock. Challenge and aspiration is why we thrive.

But organizations traditionally exist to streamline and bureaucratize problems into a bland predictable paste. It makes management easier. And they do the same to their brands if you let them. And that unsatisfying diet is why markets, employees and consumers are abandoning companies with exponential speed.

Amazingly, this realization is not happening in organizations at precisely the time when they are most under assault by self doubt and cultural change.

Profit isn't evil, it's just a by-product. Brand is the public interpretation of personal beliefs, but the only sustainable manufacture is to pursue, uncover and maintain the bonds that keep the brand alive, and growing. Your product or service is only the enabler, the excuse for connection.

Because bonds and the reassurance they provide are the only scarce commodity left in this world. Plenty of TVs to choose from. Toothpaste, insurance companies and breakfast cereals, too. Big shortage of ‘connections”.

Bonds. They are the metaphorical medicine that protects against the rough intrusions and separations that technological change has foisted on us. Bonds are the basis for atomic structure, family stability and organizational growth. They spring from proximity, community, circumstance and sometimes even by choice. But mostly bonds are accidental.

And the so the purpose of people and organizations and their brands is to place yourself in the way of good fortune and goodwill -- to create pathways for as many of those happy accidents as possible.

Reason3 – The Metaphysics of work

You might laugh, but absent family, charity or religion, in no place in modern life can people find, nor can they look for, higher ideals to share, emulate and promote than in their places and products of work. Belonging is what drives us, and nobody wants to belong where their voice is unwelcome. Brand is shared voices, merged. And healthy brands generate evangelists. And evangelists swell the ranks of churches and stamp clubs and sports stadiums and shopping malls and fortune 500 balance sheets.

Brand is the public interpretation of personal belief. Personal beliefs coalesce into community. Ad people evolve when they collaborate with the torchbearers of brand such as employees. Employees move heaven and earth when brand identity is the result of their collective values. Consumers respond when brand transcends corporate boilerplate and becomes human and personal. When it becomes a dynamic conversation.

Alchemy, our company, exists because the parents of brand – purpose, message, environment and leadership -- are really convergent crafts not divergent tools. They don’t exist independently of one another, yet are often practiced as if they do. This disconnect within organizations, this lack of bonds and shared air is the cause for dysfunction and deception, and ultimately, disappointment.

For us, it’s no accident that the output and utility of each craft is altered and elevated by the proximity of others. Or that the energy level is electric. That’s our business model. The design of architecture benefits from the influence of storytellers and motivators such as ad people. And vice versa. Strategic thinkers evolve as they rub shoulders with cultural creatives. And vice versa. MBAs eat lunch with shrinks, art meets commerce, Idealism meets pragmatism, and they actually get along.

Your work is craft. And if it's not, make it so. Your job descripion is to remain curious and to provoke. Your mission is to bring people together and ask them what they want and what they know. Your vision, enlightened by all that new knowledge, is to create answers built on optimism. Your job, wherever you may land, is to have fun, and to change your small part of the world. Go get 'em.

Craft Werk Zwei

DIY Trunk Show
We believe:
Craft is powerful. We want to show the depth and breadth of the Chicago crafting community. Anything you want‹clothing, jewelry, art, music‹you can probably get from a real live person here in Chicago. And buying handmade, one-of-a-kind goods from your neighbor kicks the ass of buying mass-produced, slave-made corporate stuff.

Craft is personal. To know that something was made by hand, by someone who cares that you like it, makes that object much more enjoyable. And it makes you feel less lonely when you realize that you know the name of the person who made the bar of soap you use, the earrings you wore when you met that special someone, or the scarf that kept you from freezing while you waited for the train.

Craft is political. We're not just trying to sell stuff. We're trying to change the world. We want everyone to rethink corporate culture and consumerism.

Craft is possible. Everybody can create something‹you don't have to be an established business to make stuff. The DIY Trunk Show encourages new crafters by giving them a place to sell their work for the first time. We hold workshops to teach people how to make things. And we're creating friendships and connections between crafters‹being a small business owner doesn't mean you have to work in isolation.


Craft Werk Ein

hobbyprincess
Draft Craft Manifesto

I’ve been trying to pin down what is driving the increasing popularity of crafting for a while now. This is what I’ve got so far:

1. People get satisfaction for being able to create/craft things because they can see themselves in the objects they make. This is not possible in purchased products.

2. The things that people have made themselves have magic powers. They have hidden meanings that other people can’t see.

3. The things people make they usually want to keep and update. Crafting is not against consumption. It is against throwing things away.

4. People seek recognition for the things they have made. Primarily it comes from their friends and family. This manifests as an economy of gifts.

5. People who believe they are producing genuinely cool things seek broader exposure for their products. This creates opportunities for alternative publishing channels.

6. Work inspires work. Seeing what other people have made generates new ideas and designs.

7. Essential for crafting are tools, which are accessible, portable, and easy to learn.

8. Materials become important. Knowledge of what they are made of and where to get them becomes essential.

9. Recipes become important. The ability to create and distribute interesting recipes becomes valuable.

10. Learning techniques brings people together. This creates online and offline communities of practice.

11. Craft-oriented people seek opportunities to discover interesting things and meet their makers. This creates marketplaces.

12. At the bottom, crafting is a form of play.

Link: Boing

Friday, June 10, 2005



Time for a change of Color?

Associated Press/Ipsos

Poll: Bush Job Approval Dips to New Low

WASHINGTON - As the war in Iraq drags on, President Bush's job approval and the public's confidence in the direction he's taking the nation are at their lowest levels since The Associated Press-Ipsos poll began in December 2003.

About one-third of adults, 35 percent, said they think the country is headed in the right direction, while 43 percent said they approve of the job being done by Bush. Just 41 percent say they support his handling of the war, also a low-water mark.

...

California retiree Carol Harvie was quick to mention Iraq when asked about how Bush was doing his job.

"I don't think he's read his history enough about different countries and foreign affairs," said Harvie, a political independent who lives near San Diego, a region with several military bases. "Anything they try to do in Iraq has spelled trouble. I think he bit off more than he can chew."

...

Support for Bush's handling of domestic issues remained in the high 30s and low 40s in the latest AP-Ipsos poll. Thirty-seven percent support Bush's handling of Social Security, while 59 percent disapprove. Those numbers haven't budged after more than four months of the president traveling the country to sell his plan to create private accounts in Social Security.

Support for his handling of the economy was at 43 percent.

The math, cribbed a wee bit, from Armando for both the half-full and half-empty crowds:
45% - Support Bush foreign policy
35% - Think the country is going in the right direction
37% - Approve of his handling of Social Security
43% - Support his handing of the economy

41% - Approve overall

55% - Don't support his foreign policy
65% - Think the country is going in the wrong direction
59% - Don't approve of his handling of Social Security
57% - Don't support his handling of economy

59% - Disapprove overall
That sucks. Congress is even lower with a 64 percent disapprove. The trend is southbound and has been since late November. The flurries of items like Schiavo, Nooklear Options and such would indicate that Republican internal polls show popping rivets in the hull. The goofball narrow-focus agenda of feeding tubes and "judicial activism" is pure double-welding the base, as is the large-scale Social Security reform cavalcade (I don't recall private accounts and carve outs being discussed during the election, do you? Voila, 59% disapproval above.)

Yeah. I was getting bored with yellow. Been that way since inauguration-ish and suddenly stopped being wheeled out after accusations of promiscuous use for news and poll management. Is correlation causality? We're gonna find out shortly, eh? Am I being cynical? Hey, it's unhealthy not to be, especially around these guys. (Gawd I would not want their track record for forecasting and pattern interpretation.) As for correlation, I recall something about "a preponderance of evidence" thoughtfully footnoted, sourced and graphed here.



Thursday, June 09, 2005



The Prodigal Fouro returns.

Greetings reader![sic?] Pardon the extended absence of typos and mumbling the last several weeks but life/business consumes, eh? Hopefully we've crossed a rubicon, passed through this vale of tears, etc and so forth.

Why all the theo-speak? Well, I just learned about the next book I'll be reading via a post over at Dailykos by diarist, teacherken. He describes "a remarkable book "The Spiral Staircase: My Climb Out of Darkness" by Karen Armstrong. A snippet:
Haym Maccoby had given me a clue when we sat together, six years earlier, eating egg-and-tomato sandwiches in the little cafe near Finchley Central tube station. He had told me that in most traditions, faith was not about belief but about practice. Religion is not about accepting twenty impossible propositions before breakfast, but about doing things that change you. It is a moral aesthetic, an ethical alchemy. If you behave in a certain way, you will be transformed. The myths and laws of religion are not true because they conform to some metaphysical, scientific, or historical reality but because they are life enhancing. They tell you how human nature functions, but you will not discover their truth unless you apply these myths and doctrines to your own life and put them into practice. The myths of the hero, for example, are not meant to give us historical information about Prometheus or Achilles -- or for that matter, about Jesus or the Buddha. Their purpose is to compel us to act in such a way that we bring out our own heroic potential.

In the course of my studies, I have discovered that the religious quest is not about discovering "the truth" or "the meaning of life" but about living as intensely as possible here and now. The idea is not to latch on to some superhuman personality or to "get to heaven" but to discover how to be fully human -- hence the images of the perfect or enlightened man, or deified human being. Archetypal figures such as Muhammed, the Buddha, and Jesus become icons of fulfilled humanity. God or Nirvana is not an optional extra, tacked on to our human nature. Men and women have a potential for the divine, and are not complete unless they realize it within themselves. A passing Brahman priest once asked the Buddha whether he was a god, a spirit, or an angel. None of these, the Buddha replied; "I am awake!" By activating a capacity that lay dormant in undeveloped men and women, he seemed to belong to a new species. In the past, my own practice of religion had diminished me, whereas true faith, I now believe, should make you more human than before."
Hoo-waa, as Pacino would say. In those two paras she gives us the arc of creativitity, hope, compassion, courage and conscience, yeah? Add in great sex and you've got a perpetual motion machine. Okay, great sex and hot, fresh Krispy Kremes and ice cold vitamin-D. Waa-hoo.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Straight outta Compound Interest
...I ain't no fool. I know bullshit when I hear it. So I gets right to tha heart of tha matta and aks ACO-LYTE, "If you care so much about tha Accountin' bruthahs an' sistahs, why didn't you get certified instead of chasin' some wack poli-sci and Russian degree?"

He start shiftin' his feet a little and hesitatin', mutterin' somethin' about attendin' grad school. That only get mah bullshit detector goin' off all tha more. I press him, and he finally say it.

"Well, I guess that I, uh, ultimately decided that, for me, from a career standpoint, accounting is too... boring."

Half tha A.R. bruthahs at that table had to hold me back. Tha Letta Opener of Death wuz practically burnin' a hole in the pocket of my Membaz Only jacket. It didn't take long foe tha Lums hostess to notice, an' soon tha manager be clearin' us out. That manager has a runnin' vendetta against me ever since I dunked some A.P. sucka's head in a vat of Thousand Island dressing at the Lums salad bar a few years ago. But that A.P. fucka deserved to be dunked, just like ACO-LYTE deserved a date wit' tha L.O.D. afta what he said.

Dag, yo. What's been goin' on these days? First, Jerry Tha Sharpie Head crosses ova to Payabo. Now, tha bruthah who once stood to inherit mah phat collection of hangin' file folders, dope-ass three-hole punch, and pneumatic desk chair wit' adjustable lumbar support decides that mah life's work not only beneath him, it boring, too....
Props on the mad TPS skeelz: The Onion. Fight tha powa that be S to tha A to tha R–BOX!